Pro-Se: How to Win Your Court Case Without A High Priced Attorney With The Revealed Rules Of Law!

Are you considering hiring an attorney for a civil or criminal case? If you are, you have come to the right place. Going pro-se should be one of your first considerations before you hire an attorney.

First, what exactly is a pro-se?

Pro-se legal representation means advocating on one's own behalf before a court, rather than being represented by a lawyer. This may occur in any court proceeding, whether one is the defendant or plaintiff in civil cases, and when one is a defendant in criminal cases.

Pro-se is a Latin phrase meaning "for oneself" or "on one's own behalf". This status is sometimes known as propria persona (abbreviated to "pro per"). Source Wikipedia.

My wife and I were forced to go pro-se when the unscrupulous attorneys we hired chose to be compromised, meaning they were acting in the best interest of the opposing side. This is also known as attorney misconduct. This was after twenty one thousand dollars had been given to these leeches and nothing to show for it after almost 2 years, not even a court date! Plus, after we fired them we found out that depositions had been set up for us and we were not told. If we had not found out to postpone the depositions it could have jeopardized the case. Worse yet, if the depostion dates had arrived without our knowledge and we didn't show up it could have resulted in our case being dismissed. When I fired these attorneys we were thrown into the position of pro-se.

We had no clue what that meant other than we were representing ourselves. Where did we go wrong? We put our trust in our attorneys who had a fiduciary duty to us. That was the first mistake. The second mistake we made was not knowing what they were doing or keeping up with them. Our first clue should have been when we received our bill and it was not itemized.

This came to our attention only after we were pro-se and because of their actions our case was almost lost. We were frantic not knowing what to do and the opposing attorney knew we did not have a clue where to begin nor would he allow us to get representation before he started to attack us.

In our desperation we scoured the internet on what to do. We came upon a course that promised it could show us the ropes. We debated for several days and decided we had no choice but to buy it. This was the first right decision we had made.

We knew our case inside and out but did not know how to convey it and what procedures to use. Meanwhile, the opposing attorney started a flurry of motions to bog us down. We were forced to go to depositions by ourselves. We were not allowed time to try and get new representation. The opposing attorney was trying to take advantage of us but couldn't because we started learning the ins and outs of the legal world just as fast as we could read and study in the new legal course. The course was very straight forward and accurate.

The opposing attorney was guilty of misconduct over and over again with outright lies that he would send to the court, and judge. We would respond to his false accusations each and every time he made them against us by filing the rebuttals in the court files. You have every right to do this, as well as address the judge.

The course we were taking was working and frustrating the opposing counsel to no end. The attorney had someone come to our door at home, which is prohibited. The attorney's actions were filed with the court.

The attorney filed for a hearing for our case to be put back to the real estate commission and we won the hearing, to their embarrassment, which took all of four minutes. When we asked for admissions, a form of discovery. He then threatened us with a protective order which he had no right doing and we called him on it. He was forced to back down. This was a well- established, insurance attorney with over twenty years experience! If it had not been for the pro-se course we would have lost by a technicality!

Many attorneys will lie and cheat when they have no defense for their clients. We were then hit with a frivolous counterclaim, which they did not serve us with as is procedure. That means it was null and void. But we called him on that, as well. The frivolous lawsuit was thrown out by the judge at another hearing before the trial.

The first thing you have to realize is that rotten attorneys are not going to change and they will continue to get away with it if you do not know the law. The best defense is knowledge.

If we can figure it out, anyone can. We learned how to overcome corrupt attorneys. We learned how to control and call the bluff of corrupt attorneys. We were taught how you can control what happens in the courtroom. We learned appellate procedure. We know the little guy can win. We know how to use the rules of law.

We were given a lawsuit flow chart to know exactly what is going on at all times. We know how to use previous appellate and supreme court decisions to prove our case. We were given free forms for pleadings, motions, and discoveries. We also were given the ways to find and contract with an honest attorney.

Very simple and straightforward, hidden information is now revealed to take the mystery out of the legal world. If you know where to go to find the laws laid down for your protection, you gain great power and the legal mystery is taken away. Whether you decide to go Pro-se or hire an attorney, this course is a must. You need to know what is going on at all times so you will come out the winner.

Don't let the other guy win by technicalities. In my opinion, this should be taught in all high schools. What good are the laws for the people if you do not know how to use them? You owe it to yourselves to check out this site. The very best to you. http://tommcinnisreviews.weebly.com/

View the original article here

Attorney - Don't File for Divorce Without Reading This

When having issues with your spouse, you probably find yourself on an emotional roller coaster. Even though you may want to work things out, especially when it comes to cheating, your spouse may not be on the same page. If your marriage becomes unhinged with infidelity, you may not see any option except to file for divorce. However, before making any moves, seek the guidance of a skilled divorce attorney. He or she can help keep you on the right track, even when your emotions say otherwise.

Many couples feel that no matter what happens in their marriage, they'll find a way to get through it. Unfortunately, sometimes the "worse" in "for better or worse" is too much for some people to handle. One of the biggest issues is infidelity and the lack of trust that can develop because of it. If you and your spouse realize you cannot have a happy life together after infidelity, it's important to talk with an attorney that can get you through the divorce proceedings.

In addition, when tensions are high, it can be hard to think rationally. Many people make bad decisions out of anger. Sometimes, if they had only waited a year, their feelings may have changed. Yet, there are those that still go through with filing and have many regrets. An attorney can spell out the pros and cons of certain decisions so that you have a clear understanding of the repercussions your actions can have.

For instance, some people are so mad with their spouse that they tell them to just leave and take all their stuff with them. A good lawyer will tell you this is a mistake, because once your anger subsides, you'll want to be protected financially. Giving your spouse whatever they want could prove disastrous for you.

Furthermore, marriages break up and they leave many kids feeling sad and depressed. If there's any possible way to work things out, couples owe it to their kids to try. Yet, in the end, divorce may be inevitable. If so, your attorney can help you figure out how to deal with custody of the children and to keep things civil.

In the heat of anger, many hurt spouses will say mean and hateful things regarding the other spouse. They don't realize how this can affect a child. Your lawyer can help guide you through the legal issues involved, but it's up to you to really think about what you're saying and how you're acting as it relates to your spouse. Your kids are listening and watching everything you say and do.

Bottom line, divorce is never easy. The good news is that you can get through it better than you can imagine, simply by seeking a skilled attorney right from the start.

A Sacramento Attorney can help you through a divorce and many other complex legal situations. There is a directory where can find all kinds of professionals: http://www.myyp.com/.

View the original article here

When Can Searches Be Performed Legally Without a Warrant?

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was put in place to regulate and guard against unlawful searches and seizures. It states that no unreasonable searches can be conducted without a warrant or written statement by the proper authority giving permission for the inspection. However, there are quite a few exceptions to this amendment that accommodate unique circumstances.

1. Consent: This is the most common form of warrantless searches. Probable cause is also not required as long as the person consenting to the search has the proper authority to do so. A person can withdraw consent at anytime during a search. In consent is no longer given, it is required that the officer conducting the search stops immediately. However, if during the course of a search the officer finds probable cause or develops reasonable suspicion, the right to retract consent is lost. Additionally, officers are not required to conduct the search in a manner that provides the person with a chance to revoke consent (i.e. executing the search in plain view or inspecting the property slowly enough that the suspect may withdraw consent). The only cases where consent cannot be refused is during prison visitation or an airport security screening.

2. Plain View Doctrine: This exception permits an officer to search and seize property that is in plain sight if it is believed to be contraband or criminal evidence. The officer is not allowed to move items in order to get a better view.

3. Crime Scenes and Emergency Aid: In the event of an emergency, an officer has justifiable cause to enter a residence or business without a search warrant. However, once assistance has been provided and there is no longer a crisis, the officer may only seize items that are undoubtedly evidence of a crime, by applying the Plain View Doctrine.

4. The Motor Vehicle Exception: Due to the many regulations they are under, there is a lower expectation of privacy concerning motor vehicles. As long as the officer has probable cause to believe the vehicle contains evidence or contraband, he/she is not required to obtain a search warrant prior to inspection, even if there is opportunity and time to do so. The searchable area can include the entire vehicle and any containers found within. It is not required that the items belong to the vehicle's owner.

5. Public School Students: This remains one of the most controversial forms of warrantless searches. In the case of New Jersey v. T.L.O., a public school search can only be considered valid when there is "reasonable suspicion that the search will turn up evidence that the student has violated or is violating either the law or the rules of the school." However, searches cannot be discriminatory or overly intrusive in a way.

6. National Borders: These searches, first permitted by Congress in 1789, do not require probable cause, a warrant, or even suspicion, to be valid. Rather, it was stated by the court in United States v. Ramsey that "searches made at the border, pursuant to the longstanding right of the sovereign to protect itself by stopping and examining persons and property crossing into the country, are reasonable simply by virtue of the fact that they occur at the border." The law allows that, under reasonable suspicion, people can be held in custody at the border for up to 16 hours.

7. Open Fields: This is another exemption in which officers may conduct searches in open fields-even when it may be considered trespassing-without obtaining a warrant. Additionally, in the case of Oliver v. United States, the court stated that refuse, abandoned materials, and public areas are also not protected by the Fourth Amendment.

If you feel like you were unlawfully searched or stopped by law enforcement, contact a Maryland lawyer today. Over the years, a Columbia criminal defense attorney has helped hundreds of people in situations probably very similar to the one you find yourself in.

View the original article here